The Evolution Of My Photography Gear
After getting more photo gear in the mail today, I just realized how much stuff I have acquired in my quest to become a better photographer. It's been four years since I started that quest, and I didn't even realize what I was getting into when I started. Here's my story.
Prior to 2003, I had a piece of junk 35mm point and shoot camera — the kind you take pictures with when you go on vacation, only to have about half of them turn out bad. I had no intentions of getting into photography, and I was perfectly happy with that. Then something happened.
2003 – The Beginning
My son was born. We found ourselves taking more photos than we ever had before. The film was getting to be a hassle. It was about this time that digital cameras were picking up in the consumer market. In April of 2003 we picked up an Olympus D560 at 3.2 megapixels and 3x zoom at a price of $300. It was good to us, and we took over 4500 photos with it before it died of telescoping lens failure in February 2005. Just before its death, our second child was born and we were taking even more photos.
2005 – Going Deeper
With a new baby in the house, we couldn't go without a camera. By this time I had my taste of photography. It grew on me and I was intrigued by it. I did my homework and found a nice ultra-zoom that would give me a little more room for growth. In February of 2005, I picked up a Konica Minolta DiMAGE Z3 at 4.0 megapixels and 12x zoom at $400. I was still taking lots of kid pictures, but I started taking photos of other things too. I was exploring the camera controls and learning how to compose my shots better. I also started working with Photoshop more heavily at this point. It's been a great camera that really made me serious about photography, and it's still alive and well today with over 5500 photos under its belt.
2006 – Getting Serious
There came a point when the ultra-zoom started holding me back from growing as a photographer — March of 2006. I got myself a birthday present. After doing months of research on dSLRs, I came to the conclusion that I was getting a Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D (now the Sony Alpha is the closest equivalent) with a 6 megapixel sensor and all kinds of buttons and knobs. I spent $1100 on the camera body only to find out that a few months later they were bought out by Sony and my camera was selling at WalMart for $500. I was ticked, but oh well. I also picked up a Konica Minolta Maxxum 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 lens (which now only has a Sony equivalent) as my first glass for around $450. Within a month, I picked up the Minolta 3600HS flash unit for another $300 along with a backpack, cheap tripod, lens cleaning kit, UV filter, extra battery, and extra memory card for an additional $350 or so. I was in heaven. But I was also out $2300. It didn't matter because I was in heaven. I've taken over 3500 shots with the camera so far. All the while, I've been keeping up with the latest versions of Photoshop — from version 6 through CS3.
A few months after I got my camera, we decided to pick up a pocket camera for everyday stuff that would be easier to travel with than the DiMAGE. In June of 2006 we got an Olympus u720SW at 7 megapixels and $400 because it was shockproof and waterproof — essential for traveling in my wife's purse. It's been a good little camera, and it fits right into my pocket when I don't want to lug my monster around. We've only taken about 1300 photos with it, but it's still young.
I've also started getting photo gear for Christmas. This last year, my parents picked me up a Giottos MM-9160 monopod and a Kenko 25mm Uniplus Extension Tube. Hooray!
2007 – Going Overboard
Is that the end? No. Not yet. In March of 2007 (for my birthday again) I picked up two new lenses. I wanted something that would go well with my already versatile 18-200mm lens. I ended up getting a Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro lens for around $350 and a Sigma 10-20mm f/4-6.3 EX DC HSM for around $470. I haven't put a lot of miles on them yet, but they're a lot of fun to shoot with. I also decided that it was time for a nicer tripod so I got a Slik Pro 700DX ($130) and a Slik AF2100 Pistol Grip Ballhead ($80). That tripod is bulletproof. I just got it in the mail, and I started playing with it — what a difference!
What's Next?
Is THAT the end? I thought so, but Michael Brown is putting bad ideas in my head with reversing rings and 50mm primes. Darn that guy! Next year, I want to pick up a super telephoto… something like the Tamron 200-500mm f/5-6.3. I had my eye on that one, but I opted for the two lenses instead. I also want to get a ring flash and a macro focusing rail eventually, but I haven't picked them out yet. And someday, when my camera dies, I'll probably pick up one of the new Sony dSLRs that have yet to be released.
Did any of you “experienced” photographers go through the same type of evolution? Exponential spending, more equipment than you can drag around with you?
And are any of you “less than experienced” photographers going through the same evolution? I'm not trying to “brag” about the photo gear I have (it's really not much compared to a pro), I'm trying to give a heads up to any of you heading down the path of serious photography — it's not cheap, and it's addictive.
Am I normal, or just an obsessive spender heading for the poorhouse? Either way, I'm having a good time.
Jenni
April 13, 2007Your post just scared the hell out of me…. I was about to do the exact same post yesterday before I saw your post about the colored infrared pictures and started experimenting with that.
But I’m glad that I’m not alone in my spending habits on camera stuff… How do you like the Sigma 10-20mm? I’m toying with the idea to buy that one next. But maybe I’ll buy a flash first or maybe both (knowing me…).
Brian Auer
April 13, 2007That’s too dang funny. Great artists think alike, right?
The Sigma 10-20mm is a great lens if you want to get those super wide angles. Super sharp images across the whole range — and I actually read that it performs better for sharpness at 10mm and 20mm rather than somewhere in the middle. The only image problem I can notice is a bit of pincushion at 10mm, but it quickly goes away. I haven’t been able to get out and do any real landscape type shots with it yet, but I’m itching to do that. The DOF at these focal lengths is amazing.
Michael Brown
April 13, 2007Don’t blame me for the mess that you’re in! 😉
It’s cool watching the progression.
Now just add a image at the end of how small your check book is getting, or how worn the credit card is.
That will wake people up real quick! LoL!
Michael Brown
April 13, 2007Well, if she kills you, … can I have your stuff?
LoL!!!
MD
April 13, 2007I’ve found a photographer can never have to much gear….Enjoy it all.
Brian Auer
April 13, 2007I have to try blaming somebody. My wife is going to kill me if I buy any more stuff!
Brian Auer
April 13, 2007You’ll have to wrestle my Dad for it.
Brian Auer
April 13, 2007I’m beginning to learn the same thing about never having too much gear. And I definitely enjoy it!
Origin
April 13, 2007Great post. It’s nice to go back and look at the progression of things every now and then. Keeps you thinking forward.
Brian Auer
April 13, 2007Thanks, I kind of shocked myself when I looked at it. When you really get into photography, you don’t realize how much time and money you start pouring into it.
inspirationbit
April 13, 2007What a great post, Brian. So that’s the path I’m heading to now – this is scary but so tempting 🙂
Brian Auer
April 13, 2007With where the technology is at and how low the prices are becoming, many people are finding themselves heading down this path. The really scary part is that as you buy more gear, you start finding even more obscure equipment to purchase. There’s no end to it.
Avelino
April 13, 2007I’m at the bottom end of the path. I went from a Canon Elph (advantix) to a Digital Rebel (the first one), which, fortunately, I didn’t buy myself. Through various jobs I’ve had the use of a camera (the Rebel, a Nikon 50D) before I finally got a Rebel XTi this December. I’m looking at a prime lens at the moment, not sure whether I want a 50, 85 or 100.
Guess I’ll see.
Jenni
April 13, 2007I’ve got the 50 Macro lens from Canon for the Rebel XT and I really love it. It gives you a really awesome and sharp picture.
Brian Auer
April 13, 2007Sounds like you’re moving on up in the world of photography gear. Lens decisions are definitely tough. I was sweating over my last lens buying decision for two or three weeks solid. I changed my mind about 8 times in the process. Just assure yourself that whatever you get, you’ll enjoy. A new lens is better than no lens at all.
Jenni
April 13, 2007I was debating between the 105mm and the 50mm but in the end chose the 50mm for no real reason :-p But now I really love it. It gives you a totally different picture somehow from my Sigma 28-300mm lens, which I could also use for Macro shots.
Brian Auer
April 13, 2007That’s the great thing about those macro primes — they give a good sharp picture at any distance, plus you can do real macro work with them. I went with a 100mm macro for two reasons: 1) It has a good standoff (~12″) at 1:1, and 2) I take more photos at longer focal lengths than shorter. If I took more at shorter focal lengths, I probably would have gotten a 50mm. The best thing I love about the true macro lens is that you can do close-up work and regular work without swapping lenses.
wingerz
April 13, 2007I definitely feel myself heading down this path, though I’m trying to get better at using the three lenses I currently own. It’s scary to think that spending $500/$1000/$1500 on a decent lens no longer seems totally outrageous.
A few days ago I blogged about a minimal setup, equipment-wise.
Brian Auer
April 13, 2007It is kind of funny when you sweat over buying the camera body for $500-$1000, then you find yourself frivolously spending $1000 at a time on one or two lenses. Good article, by the way. It should help ease some people’s concerns about getting into a dSLR.
Brian Auer
April 17, 2007I read about this camera a little while ago. It’s a very innovative idea to put the lens in a non-tradition spot. It seems like it could be a good compact alternative to the standard ultra-zoom. Although, once you go SLR there’s no going back.
sil
April 26, 2007My last piece of gear was a Manfrotto tripod – a nice gift from my beloved one. This year a I bought a Sigma 50mm macro lens but I haven’t hade much time to tst it out yet. It does seem to be a great lens though.
sil
April 26, 2007Ooops… I see a made a lot of typos in my previous comment 🙂
Yes, I will use the Manfrotto mainly for macro and still-life shots.
Brian Auer
April 26, 2007I saw that on your blog a couple of days ago — pretty nice tripod! I’m sure you’ll be very happy with it. Sigma seems to make a pretty good macro — I’m very pleased with mine. Now that you have a nice tripod, you should be able to get much more use out of your macro lens. I rarely shoot macro close-ups anymore without a tripod.
Helen
April 26, 2007what a cool idea! Love it 🙂
Brian Auer
April 26, 2007Thanks Helen, it was kind of interesting putting it together — I actually shocked myself at how much stuff I’m starting to acquire. In fact, I just got another lens in the mail last night. It’s an old 50mm f/1.4 that I’ll be using in reverse with my other lenses for some super-macro work. Now I REALLY need to get out to the gardens this spring!